Lowyat.NET: Latest posts in Intel® Core™2 Duo/Quad Overhauled Rev. 4

Post #1185

RacingTech — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:54:32 +0800

Hello everybody.... its been a while since i build my pc, it was few years back.. now i want to build an intel system... i am on a tide budget n i was wondering e7300 is a good oc cpu? if it is not, please advise which cpu should i go to? thanks....

Post #1184

-Torrz — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:44:32 +0800

walao your rig is really damn heavy

Post #1183

hengmy — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:43:43 +0800

finally get 3.5ghz 10 loops pass on IBT after tuning on the gtl ref
dfi x48 lt is really tricky for quad overclocking
anyone using these board pls share me the gtl ref for quad at 450fsb and higher, thx alot

Post #1182

andrekua — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:23:48 +0800

I think most E0 will have an easier time to surpass 4GHz compared to C0.

My E8500 C0 will do 3.8GHz on stock Vcore stable but wouldnt even bother to post when I overclock to 4GHz. Set the Vcore to +5% then +10% and lastly to +15%, but all also cant boot. Nvm la... maybe thats the result of using cheap board (Biostar G31-M7 TE) and cheapo HSF (Cooler Master old fashion P4 cooler).

Post #1181

SkywalkerxX — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:15:50 +0800

yala agree..now i'm converting from AMD to INTEL, just waiting the proc to arrive, mobo msi p45 neo2-fr already in my hand, but seeing that mobo w/o proc is like *i wanna carzy* -___-"
hope can be in ranking too haha~

Post #1180

tkh_1001 — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:53:05 +0800

maybe TS can update the results in the first page more frequently to encourage people to challenge and post more results

Post #1179

yehlai — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:01:12 +0800

Now seldom see people enthusiast to uplaod new o'c records
unlike last time all wanna get faster speed and post here haha.. miss those old days .

Post #1178

hengmy — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:23:12 +0800

just burn in this processor, 1st time play with quad
vtt more than 1.4 really will kill the processor?

Post #1177

Silverfire — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:47:48 +0800

Intel PDC E5200 would be a better choice.

Post #1176

chickenducksoup — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:16:23 +0800

hi guy i dunno this is the right thread to ask o not

which 1 is better in gaming
P E5200 vs AMD 5600+ x2

Post #1175

Silverfire — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:57:20 +0800

I can only say E8600 is made to run 10.0x

Post #1174

Darren — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:13:51 +0800

QUOTE(Silverfire @ Dec 1 2008, 08:50 AM)

He means e8600@4.42GHZ@1.36 Dual Prime95 Stable slower than e8500@4.02GHZ@1.36 Dual Prime95 Stable?
[right][snapback]21836428[/snapback][/right]

No... that fella lower the multiplier of 8600 to 9.5 to make both of it clock the same which is 9.5x. So the speed is same but result is different.

Post #1173

ericmaxman — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:32:28 +0800

- Deleted -

Post #1172

Silverfire — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:50:27 +0800

He means e8600@4.42GHZ@1.36 Dual Prime95 Stable slower than e8500@4.02GHZ@1.36 Dual Prime95 Stable?

Post #1171

andrekua — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:44:44 +0800

QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Dec 1 2008, 12:00 AM)

Hello,dumb ass
Where do you read such a difference and can you prove it?
[right][snapback]21831178[/snapback][/right]

Dont be surprised... some NBTD fella in ocforum did that.

http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?p=5768454

BUT IF YOU LOOK HERE, totally opposite result...

http://www.xcpus.com/GetDoc.aspx?doc=49&page=6
http://www.xcpus.com/GetDoc.aspx?doc=49&page=7

Conclusion = did it even bother you for a second?

Post #1170

OC4/3 — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:39 +0800

QUOTE(SkywalkerxX @ Nov 30 2008, 02:01 PM)

i heard E0 is good for overclocking ability but in game performance, the C0 owning E0..i wanna buy 1333Mhz FSB for overclocking only -___-" but right now i got rm1000 for MSI P45 Neo2-FR and proc..proc i think i will find E8200 OEM/used because i bugdet rm350 only..then another rm150 wanna buy ram 2GB for my bro pc -___-" haih..cost matter now..
[right][snapback]21819618[/snapback][/right]

Hello,dumb ass
Where do you read such a difference and can you prove it?

Post #1169

hengmy — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:03:14 +0800

QUOTE(andrekua @ Nov 30 2008, 10:50 AM)

E0 overclock better as it runs cooler.
It doesnt matter for me as I dont overclock like crazy...

Any E8xxx should be able to reach 3.8GHz easily without changing Vcore. Mine does 3.8GHz with a flip of the FSB to 400. Just change the stock heatsink to those old type P4 cooler and full load at 79C.
[right][snapback]21817010[/snapback][/right]

dont think any e8xxx can do 3.8ghz at stock vcore, especially e8200 and some bad batch e8400..

[addedon]November 30, 2008, 8:03 pm[/addedon]

QUOTE(SkywalkerxX @ Nov 30 2008, 02:01 PM)

i heard E0 is good for overclocking ability but in game performance, the C0 owning E0..i wanna buy 1333Mhz FSB for overclocking only -___-" but right now i got rm1000 for MSI P45 Neo2-FR and proc..proc i think i will find E8200 OEM/used because i bugdet rm350 only..then another rm150 wanna buy ram 2GB for my bro pc -___-" haih..cost matter now..
[right][snapback]21819618[/snapback][/right]

C0 and E0 is same in term of performance

Post #1168

tkh_1001 — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:56:46 +0800

QUOTE(andrekua @ Nov 30 2008, 10:50 AM)

erm....not really, most e8600 E0 manyak hot

and some bad chip e8400 hardly does 3.4ghz stable with stock vcore......

QUOTE(SkywalkerxX @ Nov 30 2008, 02:01 PM)

i heard E0 is good for overclocking ability but in game performance, the C0 owning E0..
[right][snapback]21819618[/snapback][/right]

no such thing bro...dont worry

Post #1167

Silverfire — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:20:01 +0800

Then go for the OEM lar >.<

Post #1166

SkywalkerxX — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:01:09 +0800